Stack Overflow was the "what is wrong with the api?" "What api to use?" "How to improve api usage/syntax?" place.

"Whats is wrong with the api?": moved to github, because its the source. "What api to use?": stackoverflow is still the place to go (or chatgpt). "How to improve api usage/syntax?" stackoverflow / chatpgt.

Github could really dominate with its own LLM in the web and Stackoverflow could regain some shares with an integrated LLM.

PS: I don't like Github Copilot because of UX and code upload.

I'm afraid "What api to use?" will be closed immediately as discussion, and "How to improve api usage/syntax?" as too general.

is this your excuse to justify the enslavement of the will of the majority by oligarchs, technocrats and tyrants?

No, see elsewhere in the thread where I advocate for liquid democracy :) It was just my way of saying there's more to it than voting (a.k.a. "excising interests")

All you accomplished was to fixate on the word “vote” which I never used and thus proving that you are the one who has some kind of weird fetish for voting with regards to democracy... congrats.

i think its also a problem of funding. the problems of today are more resource intensive. i read that succesfull test to use mrna for medical treatment were done 20 years ago and nobody realy cared and knew about it. To realy develop into something viable took years to get the attention and funding.

A villain can still be a competent villain

10k i which time frame? a crypto can in worth from 9k to 10k and back to 9k in one day.

Sounds like maybe a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) banks have always had to file.

Similar, but this applies to individuals and non-financial companies.

The exact time of transaction.

i think the differents is the lak of technical responses on the github issue from ms employees on why this was cut. This leaves only politcal reasons, which the normal ms staff don't make.

I agree. It is indeed a bit worrying. I am guessing everyone is quiet because Microsoft wants to give a single unified response. And needs some time to prepare and make a decision.

I just hope this will get resolved soon without any issues and we can move on.

I understand that MS is still here to make money. Everybody wants to do that. What i don't understand is to risk the good will of the open source coummunity, by denying a core flagship feature another competitor (flutter/google) has included for free. I donk think this is a smart choice, even if i am in it for the money.

The especially wild thing is that this decision mostly harms .NET in VS Code – another Microsoft product.

Rider’s implemented hot reload on their own, so this isn’t helping against Visual Studio’s main commercial competition.