>why do the results need to be decrypted by trustees after the election?

they probably design this system to be used for government elections, how they can convince anyone to use it when they do not use it for their own elections?

I gave it a spin with instructions that worked great with gpt-5-codex (5.1 regressed a lot so I do not even compare to it).

Code quality was fine for my very limited tests but I was disappointed with instruction following.

I tried few tricks but I wasn't able to convince it to first present plan before starting implementation.

I have instructions describing that it should first do exploration (where it tried to discover what I want) then plan implementation and then code, but it always jumps directly to code.

this is bug issue for me especially because gemini-cli lacks plan mode like Claude code.

for codex those instructions make plan mode redundant.

just say "don't code yet" at the end. I never use plan mode because plan mode is just a prompt anyways.

Plan mode is more secure.

what are tested and fairly lightweight alternatives for Loki?

elastic stack is so heavy it's out of question for smaller clusters, loki integration with grafana is nice to have but separate capable dashboard would be also fine

VictoriaLogs - https://www.truefoundry.com/blog/victorialogs-vs-loki

OpenObserve would be the simplest and most performant

isn't that weird there are no benchmarks included on this release?

I was thinking the same thing. It's the first release from any major lab in recent memory not to feature benchmarks.

It's probably counterprogramming, Gemini 3.0 will drop soon.

Probably because it’s not that much better than GPT-5 and they want to keep the AI train moving.

even if its slightly better, they might still have released the benchmarks and called it a incremental improvement. I think that its falls behind one some compared to chat gpt5

from time to time your trusted supplier might be out of stock and you need drivers quickly

even backblaze bought drives in supermarket when there was HDD shortage

how they deal with plain spam? if it's unmoderated and anonymous why it isn't floating in see of bot generated spam?

it's not entirely unmoderated. some of the rules are being enforced fairly strictly - for example, NSFW images on SFW boards get reported and erased within minutes. blatant spammers, shills, and schizos get dealt with too. only residential IPs can post, which reduces the volume of shit quite a bit. a dedicated schizo can shit up a thread, a coordinated raid can shit up a whole board, but given the ephemeral nature of 4chan, it's like pissing in an ocean of piss.

rather, it is politically unmoderated. which is, of course, the pearl-clutching anathema.

Politically unmoderated? Try to be leftist and see how long your posts last.

It's pro-Nazi because the moderators can't stand anything else.

i think this might be caused by codex. it's open source, many people use it and it uses ratatui. People check how it is implemented and discover ratatui.

I believe this might be current most popular application using this library.

I'm surprised it isn't included in this showcase

Good idea. Fixing this in https://github.com/ratatui/ratatui-website/pull/979 Disclaimer, I work on Codex since about a month ago.

I used codex to write the VHS script, which runs codex to generate a Ratatui app, and then then used codex to add this to the website. It's codapodes all the way down.

Or Claude. There are more than a few developers on my team that prefer terminal interface for their codegen chatbots.

Sure, but Claude isn't written in Rust and doesn't use Ratatui.

well there is also one weird quirk I I assumed will be also included in this article:

because a <= b is defined as !(a > b)

then:

5 < NaN // false

5 == NaN // false

5 <= NaN // true

Edit: my bad, this does not work with NaN, but you can try `0 <= null`

IEEE 754 specifically prohibits that definition, and JavaScript indeed evaluates `5 <= NaN` to false.

Yep, my memory was incorrect here and I didn't had access to computer, but it is true with `0 <= null`

This is because null coerces to 0 in JS so this is effectively 0 <= 0. NaN is already a `number` so no coercion happens.

Note that == has special rules, so 0 == null does NOT coerce to 0 == 0. If using == null, it only equals undefined and itself.

i seen similar reports on social media, all of them had in common was presence of some keywords.

Presumably ‘commit’ would have a high association with either git or self harm.

I didn't think marriage was that bad but point taken!

Yeah, they were joking.

I didn’t get the joke but I think it could be interpreted as the poster pointing out that commit is used in other places too, so it could be interpreted in two ways legitimately and sometimes sarcasm doesn’t convey in line. I like the joke now that I see it, assuming it WAS a joke.

It was a joke

you have have multiple layers of compression, but you need some simple Daemon (basically for loop in bash)

I use lz4-rle as first layer, but if page is idle for 1h it is recompressed using zstd lvl 22 in the background

it is great balance, for responsiveness Vs compression ratio

This sounds interesting. Do you have a link to the source for this daemon?

Sure I created instructions here:

https://gist.github.com/Szpadel/9a1960e52121e798a240a9b320ec...

This is ingenious, thank you.