Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | chippiewill's commentslogin

In the UK we have a convenient way of observing this phenomenon.

The FTSE100 is mostly multinational companies valued in pounds. The FTSE250 is mostly British companies valued in pounds. If the FTSE100 goes up while the FTSE250 stays flat or falls then it means the currency got devalued and there's no real growth.


I'd definitely recommend popping to an Apple store at some point and looking at a nano display in person. It's really kind of freaky, it has a paper-like quality to it that I've not seen with any other laptop display. I'm not sure a picture or a description is ever going to cut it.

To me it looked "grainy" (along with something like diffusion glow and rainbowing I think), and I can't give up the high contrast that I've gotten used to. But if you're somewhere where you can't change the bright lighting behind you (outside in this example) nano texture does work fairly well.

It’s perfect for the iPad, it adds just a little friction to the pen and makes it much more paper like in feel too.

I thought Intel was too far behind on their process nodes?

At the end of the month, laptops with Intel's latest processors will start shipping. These use Intel's 18A process for the CPU chiplet. That makes Intel the first fab to ship a process using backside power delivery. There's no third party testing yet to verify if Intel is still far behind TSMC when power, performance and die size are all considered, but Intel is definitely making progress, and their execs have been promising more for the future, such as their 14A process.

I did say in two years. Intel can still fail the validation along the way.

This line of chatter has been going around UK-centric online discussions and it's such a braindead line of thinking. Marginal pricing is used in a gazillion countries and is tried and tested.

You do marginal pricing because otherwise providers will simply bid what they think the crossover price will be - marginal prices lower prices in the long run because providers try to improve their margins and lower their bids.

Also renewables bid on the spot and day ahead markets really low because their cost is almost entirely capex (and also most are under CfD anyway so may as well bid 0) - the spread isn't nearly as good as the data would imply. If you didn't use marginal pricing you'd have them bidding higher to cover their capex.


Yeah, it's not as crazy as they make it sound. They're also technically a Commonwealth citizen and previously an EU citizen.

Not exactly two citizenships of the same country.


It really is pretty crazy that some of the more esoteric forms of citizenship have never been rolled into "British Citizen". Almost all BOTCs were given the opportunity to become British Citizens, but not all, and they kept the original status around. BNOs are similarly a somewhat silly situation especially now that it's possible to move to the UK on the special BNO visa (which gives them different/better family reunion rights than normal British citizens). British Subjects essentially don't exist in practice, but they also haven't just rolled that into British Citizen status either (British Subject is the residual status of certain Irish born people who chose to retain the status - they have the right to live in the UK on the basis of their Irish nationality, not on their British nationality which is insane). There's just a perpetual allergy to just rationalising the whole setup.

It would be perfectly politically acceptable to just do away with the statuses that have fewer than say 5000 people and grant them all full-fat citizenship. Generally people who live in the UK are shocked when they find out that holding a British passport does not entitle you to the right to live in the UK.


Wrong way round. She was born in the UK and was a British Citizen at birth and had a British passport

She is (maybe) entitled to Bangladeshi citizenship which is why the UK government was allowed under UK law to remove her British citizenship because British courts didn't consider her to be stateless.

The only people who can't have British citizenship removed are British citizens with no other citizenship or entitlement to a citizenship. I think in theory that means the British government is legally allowed to remove citizenship from any person from Northern Ireland if they justify it (since they're allowed to claim Irish citizenship under the Good Friday agreement).


At birth she was entitled to citizenship but she wasn't a citizen. Like my cousins. I describe the nuance in my other comments on this thread.

It's to remove a syntax ambiguity with c-style function declarations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_vexing_parse

The syntax ambiguity adds a lot of complexity to the grammar that makes parsing a lot more complicated than it needs to be.

Sticking `fn` in front fixes a lot of problems.


tnx for the clear explanation


> beside that my internal ip's are changing every day to bring more confusion into my internal net. nice!

You can set it up so your devices can have two IPv6 addresses. The shifting address for external traffic, and a static one for local traffic. I think this is the default in many linux distros now.


In the UK there's a standard grid used for local-only mapping: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordnance_Survey_National_Grid

It's a transverse mercator projection rather than a mercator as you might often see because it minimises distortion over the UK as a whole which means that the distortion is as you move away from the meridian, rather than as you move away from the equator (with a regular mercator I think all points have the grid aligned with true North)

This grid is setup such that it's origin is not on the prime meridian (at Greenwich), but 2deg west so only points on the line 2deg west are aligned with true north.


One of the advantages of doing this seemingly weird projection is that you can treat "local" maps (for some definition of local) as flat rectangular grids without introducing a lot of errors: drawing straight lines between two points, measuring the distance / angle between them, etc., just by dealing with a flat piece of paper. VERY convenient, but the farther you are from the center of the projection, the higher the errors that are introduced.


In short, you can treat the local geometry as Euclidean.


Or, to put it simply, the shape of the Earth can be considered flat for local mapping purposes.

If grid north and true north are the same everywhere, it would be proof the entire Earth is flat.


If your planet is tiny, it's very easy to figure out that it's a ball, a child can see it with their bare eyes. The planets in "Outer Wilds" are like that.

Because this planet is larger, smart people trying to figure out how it works used simple tools and measurements to conclude that it's a ball, we know that Greeks and Romans figured this out, I'm sure other civilisations did too.

Greg Egan's "Incandescence" has people who live somewhere where you can discover, in this same way, General Relativity. There's a small but noticeable difference between the simple linear results we'd see for Newtonian physics in rudimentary experiments and what they can observe and they figure out why. Since they have no context for what it means to observe this and have (to their memory) always lived somewhere this happens, they aren't terrified by this discovery any more than we were terrified to discover how our Sun must work - so much hydrogen in one place that it undergoes spontaneous nuclear fusion which releases so much energy that we can easily see by it even after it is no longer directly visible, OK cool, I still need groceries.


It’s easy to see that the surface of the earth is a ball - or at least a curved surface - simply by going to the seaside and watching ships dip below the horizon before they fully disappear.

The ancient Greeks proved it was a ball and measured the dimensions of it using mathematics, but the concept of a curved earth was known to seafarers long before that.


Browsers made a fundamental change a while back to not share caches between origins because caching it became a side-channel to detecting if someone had visited it before.

So now if two different websites embed the same remote font then visitors will have to download it separately for both sites.

https://developer.chrome.com/blog/http-cache-partitioning


Surely one of the most popular browsers in the world could ship with some commonly requested fonts and all you'd learn is that they were using chrome which the user-agent said anyways.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: