Even after reading the source, it doesn’t seem like they were hacked? Or if they were, they were not accused of such.

I do think hand rolling your own thing is fraught. But it is very confusing to equate one mother’s complaint to “they have been hacked”.

PS: The people who made their own s3 rans a baby monitor company. News article is about a mother reporting hearing a weird voice from the baby monitour.

Multiple reports on reddit suggest people making this baby cam do not understand security.

https://www.reddit.com/r/NewParents/comments/1ocgmoi/nanit_c... https://www.reddit.com/r/Nanit/comments/1ffc051/nanit_hacked... https://www.reddit.com/r/Nanit/comments/1dyaph6/heard_a_voic...

Maybe this is the future. But I dread looking at perfectly formatted yet sterile readme with too many emojis for comfort.

It's one emoji

I mean, literally not true. There are 7. The problem is that most of the emojis there don't do anything for the content.

Emojis are not the core problem. Mindlessly letting claude do the work and then farm karma on HN is.

Your reply mentioned "perfectly formatted yet sterile", which could just be someone paying more than 10 minutes of attention to the damn thing, and the emoji. The way you made it sound, it was full of smileys and trees and rocket ships. It's one check mark emoji used in a list of 5 items and at the end of 2 headers. You didn't say anything about Claude.

It seems like you think the author wrote this by hand and paid a great deal attention.

What do you think is the chance that claude code wrote the readme?

Sadly, it seems like it is no longer about wholesale. Nothing wrong with that, but a working wholesales market like Rungis and Toyosu Market has a different kind of functional charm to it.

At around 7.4 orthonormal basis and there after, the tex rendering stops working on the github readme preview page.

Instead, it is replaced with a red error box saying: [ Unable to render expression. ]

I wonder if there is an artificial limit for the amount of latex expression that can rendered per page.

I switched to the epub at that point. Still, credit I think to github that the page renders as well as it does.

It does say `Experience up to 1 petaFLOP of AI performance at FP4 precision with the NVIDIA Grace Blackwell architecture.` in the features section.

But yeah, this should have been further up.

They don't say it outright. But I think it is not in Claude Code yet.

> We’re also exploring how to bring long context to other Claude products. - Anthropic

That is, any other product that is not Anthropic API tier 4 or Amazon bedrock.

People love a widget. But the manufacturer loses money at the current price. Manufacturer rises their price for the widget. The resellers are still willing to buy the widget, but is now charging retail consumer more money.

I am very confused why this means Anthropic is bleeding out. The most important thing is that Anthropic has a thing people love. And can raise the price just fine.

It reads that if your $200/month sub is actually letting you spend $10k/month worth of compute, a heck of a lot of people are not going to make that jump if Anthropic start actually charging what it’s costing them to not go bankrupt.

Costs for inference have already dropped dramatically in the last few years; I think it's reasonable for Anthropic (and others) to prioritize market share as long given their ease of access to capital.