Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | fictionfuture's commentslogin

Nietzsche discusses this at length (the author mentions Jung, but Jung borrowed heavily from Nietzsche in this regard)…

Nietzsche believed that the best decisions weren’t the most rationale ones but the ones that were “life furthering.”

However he believed rationality is preferable to idealism. Therefore, best to first deal with reality, learn rationality, then make decisions with your feet on the ground


This is scary for employers and might be the most misguided move California’s made yet. Going to be a “whooshing” sound of companies headed East…

Idealism should not trump rationality; I cannot believe this actually passed into law


Let those companies that want to ignore 10% of the workforce go ahead. I'd say that's more idealist than complying with similar laws already enacted in other states as well.


California is a pretty huge talent pool to ignore, especially with Colorado already passing a similar law and many other states moving similar bills through legislature.


It's not idealism, it's shifting power to labor / the individual.



There is a worthwhile premise behind the title of this article. Success stories are generally fluff designed to rewrite history and control a desired narrative.

Most the real reasons for success are taboo, boring and too technical to talk about, e.g. "we got massive SEO traffic through user-generated content and 10x'd traffic in 2 months"..


I'm not so certain.

One of his examples of the importance of not focusing on success is actually a success story; he just conflates the path to success with the content along that path. That might sound confusing, so consider two ants that go to find food. One ant does it by crossing over an area where a plane did not crash. The other finds food by going over an area where a plane did crash. They both report back the success story - a pheromone trail that describes their respective path to success. The content along that path and the path itself are separate things. Just because the content on the path to success involved reasoning with regard to a plane which just so happened to be crashed doesn't mean that communicating expected value of paths in general is refuted. Otherwise the point is self-refuting, since it argues on the basis of a path description which has positive expected value that path descriptions of expected value are inherently flawed.


Can you go a little more into success being taboo? This is quite interesting but I am not sure if we are thinking the same thing.


Funny that your example sounds like a stereotypical self-congratulatory Hacker News article


Or, "I'm fully self-made. All I had was an introduction to the CEO of Sequoia by my father who happens to be a Senator and a small zero-interest loan, barely a million dollars."


The struggle is real


I encountered a founder once who built his small empire from just an idea in a garage. How did the employees know it started as an idea in a garage? Because he started every speech at every company meeting by telling the story. But if you dug just a little deeper, you'd learn that this was like the fourth or fifth startup he tried. Every time one failed, he'd go back home, live off his family's wealth for a little while dreaming up the next attempt.

Yea, I could also be a pro baseball player if I got an infinite number of at-bats.


Bitcoin’s “killer app” and underlying utility is illegal transactions. Money laundering and drug purchasing. As long as the government allows it; crypto will have a base value in that.


Only thing that revived crypto was all the free biden-bucks they printed. Free cash needs somewhere to go.


Not for nothing, but the majority of stimulus money was dispensed using checks with "Donald J Trump" written on them.


While some might disagree, many historians associate Petrarch’s rediscovery of Cicero’s letters as the start of the renaissance and the end of the Middle Ages.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrarch

I’d recommend anyone study Cicero as he was a sole source for many of the “best practices” stolen from antiquity; his writings are the basis for the US government (for example)


To be fair, most micro service setups and tutorials have been overly complicated; however, let’s agree that distributed workloads and architecture are superior in a number of ways.

Generally, when people discuss going back to the “monolith” they just haven’t found the right distributed architecture.


Big one for me is logging, auditing, etc.. is always an afterthought. I am guilty of this as well, but really it should be the first thing you do, and do very well, in a way that is really convenient for everyone, before you think about anything distributed.


I run analytics company and (off the record) we detect roughly 75% of paid traffic as bots, w 50% of the remaining in iframes


What's your analytics company?


South Orange county is where people should go; if taxes aren't the reason for leaving ...


This is the white answer.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: