And so we're getting to the burning books part.

AI don't "solve" problems, best it can do is remember them. Ask them to solve anything new that's challenging and it starts to hallucinate. At least currently.

And I'm ashamed that OpenAI and Sam altman are walking around talking about AGI. And I'm so... disillusioned by the entire tech community that they have fallen for it or they at least pretend to believe it. It's like LinkedIn Where everybody pretends to be cringe, positivity, people. Even though they know it's cringe and nobody believes it.

Whenever AI hallucinates a little complex SQL or some tool / language it doesn't have much training data on, I think of AGI hype and Sam Altman's words on how AI can be used to cure cancer in near future.

Instead if they rightly just said it is an useful tool to be used by researchers to help them like a smart calculator for big data, it would be so much more honest and correct.

Moreover, the manual also lies about the tools limitations.

If something is bad or wrong and not fixed yet, people have/need to criticize. What's so wrong about that?

200 IQ: Waste time rewriting AI slop.

"You are not immune to Brain Rot"

Make it windows 95 grey for all I care, just , for the love of whatever is sacred, improve the DOM to make it run smooth... I'm sure it is done to discourage you from using a browser and prefer their stupid app.

The only crime here should be homeschooling.

Which means that in another parts of the world are warmer than it should be, not your current location, or bubble. These are global averages.

Pretty images are worthless, there's no point staring at images that have were made without intention or effort. Making a prompt is hardly any effort and more of a lucky hit.

Making a good generated image is way more than typing a prompt.

How? Seriously, beyond coming up with the prompt, how is synthetic content more then typing a prompt

Look for ComfyUI tutorials on YouTube. Creating something unique is elaborate and requires developing skills no different than Photoshop or any other digital art tool.

There's equally no point staring at images that were made with intention or effort either.

It doesn't pass a blind scientific placebo test.