Does it follow then, that we should socialize our losses and ignore their TOS? It looks like yet again - fortune favors those who ask forgiveness later.

What if this repo itself was vibed

I didn't have the patience to click through after visiting a few pages only to find the depth lacking.

About an hour ago or so I used Opus 4.5 to give me a flat list with summaries. I tried to post it here as a comment but it was too long and I didn't bother to split it up. They all seem to be things I've heard of in one way another, but nothing that really stood out for me. Don't get me wrong, they're decent concepts and it's clear others appreciate this resource more than I.

Looking at the commit log, almost every commit references an AI model:

https://github.com/nibzard/awesome-agentic-patterns/commits/...

Unfortunately it isn’t possible to detect whether AI was being used in an assistive fashion, or whether it was the primary author.

Regardless, a skim read of the content reveals it to be quite sloppy!

The flow was, me finding interesting pattern -> Claude ingesting the reference and putting it in a template -> Me figuring out if it makes sense -> push

Author here. Yes, CC is the maintainer. When I stumble on a decent idea, I would just feed it to CC to create a pattern out of it. This was my quick and dirty approach to a public learning log with an idea that I would get back to it at some point and clean it up. Which I did on a few occasions.

It’s slop all the way down

peak hacker news comment lol

I've only been here for a month. I guess I'm learning well

I agree. Software development is on an ascent to a new plateau. We have not reached that yet. Any skill that is built up now is at best built on a slope.

it means you can make it do stuff (run preconfigured programs) for you, and not just chat with you

When I got into computing, it was a refuge from societal expectations. Now you cannot code in whatever programming language because of societal expectations to do it safe, do it with modern libraries, with the right build system etc.. just do what you like. Its OK. Have fun.

Can someone clarify how deepnote has the authority to declare the "successor" of Jupyter?

Yes. JK Rowling can still sue about her work being used for training. This lawsuit is about the illegal downloading of her works.

Does JK Rowling really deserve any fairness? She doesn't seem to think that everyone deserves it

Maybe these labs should consider funding specific models, and funneling returns back to investors from profits made with those models. Like the film industry.

TLDR: tensorrt