Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more jamesholden's commentslogin

Sorry to send dense, but it says No-hole surgery. How then, is the 'ink' delivered to the right location for this to work?


My guess is through an injection. Calling a needle injection site a surgery hole is excessively pedantic. A normal person would not call a vaccine injection or a blood test "surgery."


That was a hell of a wiki dive. Thanks. Tragic story :(


I came here thinking I would be one of the first to say this.. ha! Seconded then. Keep a good exclude/include list, and make sure to export a copy.


I was thinking about joining them to try it out.. but now I feel yucky.


Even with this obfuscation, it is still more fair to its creators than most other platforms. It's just not quite the co-op structure their marketing makes it out to be, which is indeed disingenuous (IMO).


Key findings and implications:

1. The court rejected IA's fair use defense, finding that its digital lending practices merely substitute for and do not transform the original copyrighted works.

2. IA's activities are likely to cause significant market harm to publishers' e-book and digital licensing businesses, which outweighs any public benefits of expanded access.

3. Allowing widespread unauthorized digital copying and distribution, even by a nonprofit, would undermine the fundamental purpose of copyright law to incentivize creative expression.

4. The ruling highlights the tension between expanding public access to knowledge and preserving authors' and publishers' exclusive rights over their works, which copyright law is meant to balance.

5. The decision sets an important precedent limiting the ability of digital libraries and archives to widely distribute copyrighted works online without permission, even if the intent is to increase public access.

-Kagi Sum


I have some freak brain (and IKEA experience) which usually let's me do IKEA pretty well. What was it that happened in your case? I'm curious what brought you to that point.


Maybe they moved? In my experience, IKEA furniture that isn't solid wood (more and more of it is heading that direction to their credit) tends to not make it more than 1 move.

I just got done (mostly) reassembling a wardrobe. It's a bit more wobbly around the edges. I'm not sure if it's because I didn't put the shelves back in the exact spots (wasn't thinking and didn't label them during disassembly) or if it's something else, but once we decide it's not good enough for the room upstairs where it now lives, it's getting put in the dumpster.


I tend to assume that IKEA furniture shouldn't be actually taken apart once put together, and so far that's worked out fine for us. There are some pieces that are obviously repeatable (table legs screwed into metal mounting brackets) but with a lot of the steps you can feel as you're doing it the first time that it's not going to work well if you have to undo it.


True. Adding a few 2" screws (into pilot holes) makes an enormous difference to the rigidity of their (e.g.) wardrobes and kitchen units. Even on first assembly, but especially if you have to take apart and rebuild.


IIRC when we wanted to move one of the pretty large IKEA dressers that had to be at least partially disassembled to fit through the door there was no non-destructive way to dismantle it. And that was not about trivial things like the back panel being nailed, but about fasteners of the actual structural parts being inaccessible once you put the whole thing together. One would think that going through the assembly steps in reverse should work, but for some reason it did not. I ended up breaking few structural braces (~18x48mm pieces of fiberboard) at the back of the thing to take it apart and replacing that with wooden beams of the same size.


This "trend" of furniture being made of composite materials makes no sense to me. They're obviously so much weaker. I've had nightstands that sway like a tree in the summer breeze. Furniture today though doesn't feel much cheaper. Even the "luxury" brands these days, who charge big bucks, sneak in composite.


>This "trend" of furniture being made of composite materials makes no sense to me.

Solid wood is expensive, in a lot of the world.

And for furniture, you can't do a good job with cheap wood - if it twists or bows the doors won't close right, or the drawer will be tight. Need a hole in a particular position, but there's a knot? You're going to have a bad time. Wood with loads of knots doesn't look great. And of course, some types of wood cost a lot more than others.

Chipboard with veneer, though? It's super cheap. You can have any colour you like. It machines consistently, with no knots or checks like that. The response to temperature and humidity is even and consistent. If you need more strength, you can just order thicker boards. Sure, you can't leave it outside in the rain - but so what?

The main downside to flat pack furniture is a lot of people don't manage to assemble it right. A nightstand will end up in an awful state if the person who assembled it forgot to nail the back on properly, or used a short screw where a long screw was called for, or put a part in the wrong way around.


It depends, a lot of composite materials are actually stronger than just solid wood, while being lighter and easier to move. Sometimes there are too many shortcuts though.

Wood veneer over cheaper materials has been common for over a century at this point though.


It does make the furniture much lighter and therefore easier to move. I once had to move a plywood dresser and it was an experience i'd rather not repeat. Light furniture on the other hand is a pleasure to work with.


It was actually an order issue. I had ordered a child’s loft bed for pickup and went to go pickup when I got the email to tell me to do so. When I showed up they said they didn’t have it because they sold it. Apparently just because you order something for pickup doesn’t mean they can’t sell it off the floor.


I bought a bed that when built according to instructions would end up broken. I tried to blame my son, then I dug in on the details. Absolute garbage. Through it in the box,sort of, hauled it back in and demanded my money back. While I was waiting in line I was staring at signs exclaiming the policy about no refunds. Dude saw the look on my face and didn't say one word, just gave me money back. I ordered a replacement from Amazon made out of steel.


Do it! I don't live in Australia or have on of these systems, but I was intrigued by how the OP had gone around the company to save themselves 1500! I'm curious to see how people are resolving things like this, so that if I have issues myself sometime, I have ideas on where to start or what is necessary :)


When I visit the link, I see nothing about the network or anything. It's just a login page, and then a signup option. It's not clear what I'm signing up for, or what data is needed and what service is provided. Making me reluctant to sign up for something where this is not even a demonstration or example of what access provides..


I didn't really focus much designing the login and signup page much. But if you would like you can always give me a feedback in the github discussion[https://github.com/ezpie1/lambda-official/discussions/catego...]


Constructive criticism: This sounds interesting, but it's lacking tangible examples. What does the interface look like? How do you share things? Are repositories private or open? Are there public repositories for collaboration? I understand the problem you're addressing, but the direction is unclear.

Respectfully, the current webpage and explanation don't provide enough detail to entice me to join the waitlist.


Not trying to entice you with this comment, moreso trying to clarify, especially since you took the time to give constructive criticism:

My thinking is this: everyone has their own repository of useful resources, divided into categories, languages, etc. The public v. private question is a good one: my initial thought is to give users the choice to do public _or_ private. This will let folks create code snippets that they'd rather keep private and share others that they're interested in sharing.

As for collaboration, I think I'd rather divide this up into discussion collaboration (comments, namely, and maybe code-level comments on snippets) and code-level collaboration (like contributing to a piece of code with a Git-like PR), so that users can choose how they want to interact.

I want to re-clarify, this is an idea still in its infancy, so if there's something you'd like to see, that's the real purpose of this post: to get a feel for what folks would like to see, so I'm not just building something for myself.


There's zero info on how the product would work or what it even looks like. I need something more tangible to want to sign up as well.


That's totally fair! This is a project I started last week, so I definitely plan on posting more about it in the future, on the blog, etc. I got some good feedback on Reddit about feature requests, and HN is full of devs who would benefit from something like this, so I wanted to gather some feedback on what people would want.


This situation is interesting, but the article mentions using a VPN for example, and also the recovery email.

What if my recovery email is to another proton mail account? What if my VPN used is Proton VPN?


A recovery email is optional, and Proton VPN is no logs.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: