Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mdale's commentslogin

Right, have to add strait up shooting US citizens to the list :/

What witnesses are desribing in Minniapolis is a public exicution, by ordering a woman to drive away, but there was no room to turn around, and he ran up to the car and shot her 3 times in the face as she was trying to manouver and follow orders. The authorities are trying to call him a hero. On topic, for the life of me I realy cant imagine ICE possesing the capability for surveillance no matter what they buy, and it is clear that government and media company are providing direction ,or sometimes specific actions, other than just go fuck some people up in this area code.

[flagged]


Just to see if I got this right. Masked car-jackers could and should be met with deadly force.

The killer stepped in front of her car to shoot her.

That's not self-defense, that's murder.

And ICE does not have the authority to detain a citizen for a traffic violation, any more than I do.


There's nothing wrong with that if it's justified.

It was not.

[flagged]


She was literally complying, the officer by her window yelled "get out of the way".

Almost like it's irresponsible to not require 2 factor now days.


As the OP outlined 10x is common place now; where as my best day pre-AI may have been 500 LOC now 5K LOC per day is routine. So a few months on a solo project has produced ~500k lines of code.

The code base is disproportionally testing automation, telemetry and monitoring systems but a lot code none the less ;) So even in a solo/small team project depend on architecture, procedures, test suites etc. over knowing every line of code.


Forking a 500k LoC project takes only 5 seconds on github so that is a 1000000x.


Genie 3 is already a frontier approach to interactive generative world views no?

It will be AI all the way down soon. The models internal world view could be multiple passes and multi layer with different strategies... In any case; safe to say more AI will be involved in more places ;)


I am super intrigued by such world models. But at the same time it's important to understand where they are at. They are celebrating the achievement of keeping the world mostly consistent for 60 seconds, and this is 720p at 24fps.

I think it's reasonable to assume we won't see this tech replace game engines without significant further breakthroughs...

For LLMs agentic workflows ended up being a big breakthrough to make them usable. Maybe these World Models will interact with a sort of game engine directly somehow to get the required consistency. But it's not evident that you can just scale your way from "visual memory extending up to one minute ago" to 70+ hour game experiences.


Was spending a lot with cursor switching between sonnet and opus 4.1s like 1500 to $2k a month. Was doing a lot of tabs in parallel of course. Output was like 5k lines on Good day. (Lines not the best measurement) But a yard stick against feature testing and rework.

Now with gpt-5-codex and codex vs code ext .. getting through up to 20k line changes in a day again lots of parallel jobs; but codex allows for less rework.

The job of the "engineer" has changed a lot. At 5k lines I was not reviewing every detail but it was possible to skim over what had changed. At 20k it's more looking at logs performance / arch & observation of features less code is reviewed.

Maybe soon just looking at outcomes. Things are moving quickly.


Sounds like a different use case than Cursor. Editing that many files/lines probably scales better with a CLI tool. Cursor makes more sense for day-to-day maintenance and heavy hand-holding feature development coding.

If I was building a new project from scratch I'd probably use a CLI tool to manage a longer TODO easier. But working on existing legacy code I find an IDE integration is more flexible.


And this unreviewed code is going into production?


The poorly named "Autopilot" is a good analogy. The LLMs can definitely help with the drudgery of stop and go traffic with little risk; but take your eye off the road for one second when your moving too fast and your dead.


It isn't, because no one is dying from not looking at the LLM's output in the next second. One is free to look at one's preferred speed.


For an increasing set of product attracting attention and midshare is the product. Creator economy; open source projects that have many stars safer to use then ones that don't. AWS better to use than some small competitor because you know many others are in that same boat. "Not fired for using Microsoft" etc.

Widely used and viewed is value; less and less does a product evaluation work in isolation. So very difficult to evaluate products fairly in that sense. Something may be better but it's only in so far that your review agragation / index is a fair market for attention.

Think GitHub stars and amazon reviews for products or product hunt for new startups, or YouTube or LinkedIn views; all have their game of gathering attention / marketing that plays into products visibility and viability.


The phrase was originally "Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM", which, ironically, did not save IBM once the cost effectiveness of alternatives was too overwhelming to ignore. The effect of mindshare isn't all it's cracked up to be.


How well does the average employee do it? The baseline is not what you would do but what it would take to task someone to do it.


It's not racist to push baseless claims the opposition who is black was born in Africa and not qualified to run for office ?

How else would you define racism if not across xenophobic lines by the color of ones skin ?


Obama was not his opposition, and that was not his campaign.


So when Trump admitted on Howard Stern that he likes to walk in on naked teenage girls because his role of running the teen universe beauty pageant allows him to get away with that, that is ok because he wasn't running a campaign at the time?

Jump to 1:38 https://youtu.be/kikTv0I8XVw?si=VVfSpMDt7rKEIcRJ


What the heck are you talking about?


I think it's fair to call out a action reaction flow that got us here; but if we can't see we have swag into something far more destructive to free speech as the article outlines; I don't count this as intellectual honest discussion.

We are past the point of "everyone has their perspective on this" right and left have their own version of this etc. The system that protected people's right to have different opinions is being dismantled.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: