I'm really surprised that in https://www.govdirectory.org/countries/ " most (all?) E.U (so yes, I'm talking about political Europe, not geographical Europe) are not there :(

What could be the reason for this?

It is at the end of the page:

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Govdirect...

This article is based on this https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA4451-1.html which is NOT a peer reviewed study but a "research report", which doesn't mean it's wrong or false or fake, but it means that you have to read it with extreme precautions.

Nothing in there has been double-checked by reviewers :/

Side note: if you're autistic -> this article isn't for you.

This is one of the oldest trick in the book of very very dumb people who confuse "the truth" with "what they think".

I'm sure we all met that person in the family or in a new job, or at school being so proud of themselves for being "honest", and later on you discover that their honesty is not honesty, it's just "saying whatever crosses their mind unfiltered".

I started to follow documentation here (https://docs.inkeep.com/self-hosting/docker-local) to run things with Docker.

-> connect to the locally installed instance of SigNoz

-> It asks for an email -> when I type it, it says: "This account does not exist. To create a new account, contact your admin to get an invite link"

-> But I am the admin :'), also tried to create an account there https://signoz.io/

-> but they refuse personal Github or Gmail accounts for now.

Conclusion

So it's literally impossible to run your app for a 'normal person' running their own server :(

Or maybe I missed a step :/

Hi! Could you look inside the generated .env file? You should be able to find there

Oh alright, I didn't notice that!

Thanks a lot <3

Great!

Last time I checked, Intel's MSRs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model-specific_register) allow Intel PCM (https://github.com/intel/pcm) to work, are indeed used to profile, or "measure performance" (sorry if my vocabulary is not the most accurate). Last time I checked the code of Intel PCM, it still relies on hardcoded values for each CPU which are as close as possible to reality but are still an estimation.

It doesn't mean that you get wrong measurements, it means there's a level of inaccuracy that has to be accepted.

BTW, I am aware that Intel PCM is not a profiler, and more of a measurement tool, however you CAN you use it to 'profile' your program and see how it behaves in terms of computing and memory utilization (with deep analysis of cache behavior (cache hit, cache miss, etc.))

Maybe it's a matter of time and process?, bear with me:

An encyclopedia is slow. It has to be slow. It's good (beneficial) that it's slow.

And yes, it means that it is self-correcting, slowly

Thing is, if it was fast to self-correct -> it would generate more errors and it would leave the door opened to more errors.

Whoever chose flashy colors for this is a motherfluffer :')

It's a default Neovim theme: murphy

Oh well: "ouch" is all I my eyes have to say ^^

So you mean that with lactose intolerance, I could be more productive? :3

Yep good catch.

To be fair, I discovered this article today, and I read it with passion.

Because, even though I'm 43yo, I'm too young to have worked professionally with other OSes than Windows and Linux. And it's super interesting for me to discover that astronomers had software solutions which were discarded and when they tried to protect what they had, they faced the "priesthood" mindset that is so well described in this article.

I'm not trying to troll, but I feel that this priesthood mindset is exactly the same as the one used when people destroy anyone who dares to criticize git. I think this quote from Douglas Adams and from that article fits perfectly: "their fundamental design flaws are completely hidden by their superficial design flaws".