Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ms4720's commentslogin

Vax VMs used to do that.

Also anything the compiles to a C shared library also does that


Gulags are good?


Given the US incarceration rate now, it'd be not far from truth to say that US is having its own Gulag moment. Just without other Soviet benefits.


You really should emigrate to North Korea. (Of course you will not do that, everyone is a hero on the internet.)


I'm not sure how bad north korea really is. Because, despite what you may think, we do get propaganda. See how every single time a ransomware hits a company it's always russia/iran/north korea sending it? Do you really think there are no criminals in the rest of the world trying to make some quick money?

Or, notice how ukraine went from "nazi shithole" to "beacon of freedom and democracy" once the war started?

To know how things really are behind the propaganda is basically impossible.

> Of course you will not do that, everyone is a hero on the internet

Well most people don't speak korean…


> Well most people don't speak korean…

Start and learn Korean, and then emigrate. Tell us in 30 years time how it went.


After he gets to North Korea you will not hear from him again.


You advocate for a society without jails?

I mean it'd be great but is it really feasible?


Minimum wage raises encourage two things in business:

- automation, ie order at a kiosk at McDonald's - not hiring for the job because it is not profitable to do.

This is what happens to low skill workers when we make low skill jobs too expensive.


Not sure if you've noticed but all those things have happened (self checkout, ordering kiosks) while wages haven't grown to meet inflation.


Sure, and that's not a bad thing by itself. It moves the needle up.

I don't think corporate has ever said "we have too many people who want to work". There will be more jobs out there that can't be automated, at least until we hit Terminator levels of sentience. But by then our robot overlords will solve capitalism for us.


I think the problem is that if hashicorp thinks you are a competitor you and your clients now have legal/operational issues. Ie you are now a competitor because we are releasing a product just like yours, here is a letter from a lawyer telling you to stop using terraform.


> if hashicorp thinks you are a competitor

This is precisely the problem with the new BSL license. Whether your usage of Terraform complies with the license isn’t determined by the legal terms, but instead is entirely at the whim of HashiCorp. And they can change their mind at any time. It makes it impossible to build anything on top of Terraform.

I talk about that more here: https://blog.gruntwork.io/the-future-of-terraform-must-be-op...


This covers really well why I think the BSL license is a non-starter for things like TF. I get trying to prevent AWS from competing with you using your own open source code, but it creates this ambiguity where it's not clear whether lots of uses are or are not competing with HashiCorp.

> For example, if you’re an independent software vendor (ISV) or managed service provider (MSP) in the DevOps space, and you use Terraform with your customers (but not necessarily Terraform Cloud/Enterprise), are you a competitor? If your company creates a CI / CD product, is that competitive with Terraform Cloud or Waypoint? If your CI / CD product natively supports running Terraform as part of your CI / CD builds, is that embedding or hosting? If you built a wrapper for Terraform, is that a competitor? Is it embedding only if you include the source code or does using the Terraform CLI count as embedding? What if the CLI is installed by the customer? Is it hosting if the customer runs your product on their own servers?

The answer is at the whim of HashiCorp and subject to change at any point in the future. Even ignoring the attempt to dilute the meaning of "open source", the practical implications of the BSL license are more than enough reason to coalesce around a truly open source fork IMO.


I worked at a financial institution that heavily utilized terraform. Their business is banking and they do not offer automation, orchestration or IaC as a service. They're fine.

This seems to affect only those places that attempt to build a business off terraform.

I am not saying those businesses can't be mad at the rug getting pulled out from under them, but it's important to be accurate that this doesn't affect end users of TF directly.


Is the financial institution made up of separate legal entities which bill each other for services, and does one of those entities provide tech infra for the other legal entities?


Good point, but no. Also I think they pay Hashicorp for support.


The messiness of the real-world unfortunately doesn't play well with ambiguity in licences :)

It'll be a headache for every large company which now has to send the licence to their legal teams who have to ask these kind of questions (another interesting one is "can contractors touch our terraform setup?") - in fairness to Hashicorp they've tried to address some of these issues in their FAQ, but the FAQ isn't legally binding so legal teams have to go on what's actually written in the licence.


Tweets get published, your posts are long enough.


Then your country is too weak for democracy


Then what?


No if your system gets weaker by that you need a stronger system


Agree. Suggestions?


Like Free bad?


Should be FreeBSD, damned Auto correct


That is illegal and if it ever comes to light you are done


Huh? Staff augmentation contracts are super common. They're definitely not illegal. And the risk in employment classification mistakes is to the employer, not the contractor.


The "you're done" might be an EU thing: I know Europe has all sorts of wild laws around contractor/employee differentiation.

In the US, though, yes, the risk is on whoever the IRS feels is the "employer" in the situation (hint: it's not the contractor).


It is a scam


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: