Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | slt2021's commentslogin

Great project for when you want to exfiltrate data using ssh/scp, but the corporate firewall blocks outbound ssh


SSL has Certificate Revokation List, this could be implemented for Digital ID as well.

In fact, if British Digital ID is based on PKI, then CRL will come out of the box

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certificate_revocation_list


Fun fact, that the famous Holocaust five digit number is still used today in IBM mainframe RACFs, this is coming from the punch cards era, when the census data was tabulated in Nazi Germany with the help of Thomas Watson.

I worked at a large US bank, and we used IBM mainframes at the core, including user identity.

Every employee had a five digit number as login, no different than Holocaust prisoner number, with a prefix, indicating user account type (employee, non-employee, service acct, etc).

My IBM number was 23579


JIDF and Unit 8200 have infiltrated a lot of US tech companies.

This is a very significant issue for American tech companies, they either need to restore the trust of global customers, or they will lose it completely.


this is a part if bigger package of bills to reform the Dept of State and give it more powers


>>to gain points with the electorate

are you 100% sure the point of this bill that punishes free speech is to gain points with electorate? or perhaps the donor-class ?


Who is the judge? Looks like there is no due process, just the discretion of Marco Rubio is enough to revoke passport/visa


The bill says that it can be challenged in court. But in the first instance, the Secretary of State would make the decision.


https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/5300...

The bill (HR 5300, Section 226) does not actually say that.

> Any individual who, in accordance with this section, is denied issuance of a passport by the Secretary of State, or whose passport is revoked by the Secretary, may request a hearing to appeal such denial or revocation not later than 60 days after receiving notice of such denial or revocation.

That's an administrative hearing, not a court one. One could presumably still sue over this, but the likely end result is SCOTUS saying "nah".


How many tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees does it cost to challenge something like this in court?


FIRE or the ACLU would likely represent affected citizens for free, even if they do things that are likely over the line. They would want to see the line drawn appropriately (which in their case means in a very free speech-friendly way).


They only have so much money and lawyer hours.


Well, that's moving the goalposts a bit. This strikes at the core of FIRE's work, and even though the ACLU has backed away from free speech a bit in recent years (based on the possible impact the speech would have on other priorities for the ACLU), I think in this case that would not be a limiting factor for them.

These organizations have tons of money and can bring on outside counsel to supplement their own. Also, merely having them on record as defending you would go a very long way in settlement negotiations. The bigger practical hurdle is knowing they exist in the first place, if you're affected. Presumably a quick chat with an LLM would point someone in their direction though.


Yeah, the courts don't even have to involved. All you need to do is be charged, and they can revoke the passport, even if charges are later dropped.


Let me guess, you include yourself in the list of smartest people in the world?


Most importantly no due process, no court judgement required. Just the discretion of Marco Rubio


Why is this flagged?


Flamebait politics, obviously.


what exactly is flame bait?

losing US passport seems like big deal that affects everyone in US


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: