Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | stargrazer's commentslogin

To go along with this, the ACM has a recent article on Automatically Translating C to Rust. It gets into the challenges of 'understanding code and structure' so that the end result reflects the intent of the code, not the actual execution paths.

https://cacm.acm.org/research/automatically-translating-c-to...


Is there an easier way to get around all the complicated cookie selection? I don't care if they have 183 trackers. Do I need all those? Are the important to me? I suppose they are important to them. Isn't there just a 'no to all' or at least a 'just the bare minimum for state management'?


I use https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/consent-o-mat..., though it didn't work so well for this site.


They never showed how they stopped the truck. It could have been anyone.


Could have been the Spanish Inquisition.


The title has nothing to do with the link. Correct link?

Probably meant this: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-10-29/wall-stre...

'The trade, dubbed a “box spread,” carried a kind of mystique. By combining two opposing options positions — one bullish, one bearish — Yang built a strategy that mimics a fixed-rate loan: upfront cash now, repayment at a set date, and a locked-in cost in between.'


It's a type of arbitrage, no?


Not entirely; it's doesn't necessarily involve taking advantage of price discrepancies in different "markets" of the same asset, or contract so to speak in this case, and so it doesn't necessarily lead to "guaranteed" profit in the way that arbitrage does.



Deny All, Accept All, but I never (except in a handful of cases) see the Accept Required. Let us admit that there are cookies required for maintaining state within a web site and account.

I default to Deny All, but click on Accept Required when I see it (trusting that it does do what it says it does)


Deny all should be equivalent to accept required, to my understanding anyway.


reolink, also look at the frigate nvr software, they have a list for decent recommendations


This is the way.

Reolink cameras are pretty good for what they are. Just dont buy into their NVR solution...

Frigate also has some interesting applications to go along with it, see: https://github.com/mmcc-xx/WhosAtMyFeeder

I also have YOLO on my to do list for the home cameras.


What's wrong with their NVRs? I have one connected to some Reolink cameras (though not yet the full house-surrounding setup I have planned) and it seems fine so far.


Reolink with Synology NAS using their native Surveillance app. All stored locally, no cloud. One issue with Reolink I haven’t solved is that it is unable to detect approaching cars in the night. Departing cars work fine though. Otherwise no complaints.


Dont dorget to pay Synology for the extra licenses for more cameras.


Yes I did pay for extra licenses. I also paid for the cameras to Reolink and disks to WD.


I’m less happy with Reolink and most of Reolink are now in a drawer. Been a fan of Amcrest and Scrypted.


How do you "detect specific signals in their DNS configurations"? The naive answer is you have access to dns hosters. Or from cookies? or ... ?


but then, why code with exceptions, why not perform pre-flight/pre-validation checks and minimize exceptions to the truly unknown?


I guess training LLMs on works of fiction/sci-fi would not be of net benefit. No distinction between reality and perceived reality. Considering LLMs have a hallucination problem as it is.


I appreciate your work, Bolderman. Sorry to see it go. May the future be fruitful.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: