Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Can you link to where they admit to anything more than the possibility of wrongdoing?

What they're saying appears to be "we involved humans, we acknowledge humans can be biased, we will remove some human involvement going forward" which is very different than "we hid stories from sources we don't like."

Some conservative groups (and the author of this article, seemingly) would have you think they acknowledged that they did something wrong but I only see them stating the opposite.



I don't need to link a source, you summed up my meaning of the problem they admitted to quite well on your own.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: