You do realise that most IPv6 implementations randomise the /64 "host" part of the address, right?
IPv4 NAT does not provide any additional privacy over IPv6.
You can jump up and down and claim the contrary, but it's just not the case.
Meanwhile, Facebook, Google, and the like are scraping petabytes of information about every Internet-connected person on the planet and selling it to the highest bidder. These organisations are not slowed down in the slightest by IPv4 or IPv6.
IPv4 NAT does not provide any additional privacy over IPv6.
You can jump up and down and claim the contrary, but it's just not the case.
Meanwhile, Facebook, Google, and the like are scraping petabytes of information about every Internet-connected person on the planet and selling it to the highest bidder. These organisations are not slowed down in the slightest by IPv4 or IPv6.
This is your argument in a nutshell: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/pregnant-pause-2/