Pandemic+unknown disease status is proof of danger.
You can argue that isn't a high enough standard, but it's a pretty clear one, and given the exponential spread, it's a real actual danger that can be controlled at the point of entry.
Given that Virus and Biology have no obligation to be compatible with various national and international laws, it is upon human society and governments to work around the virus.
Thus, for e.g., people in South East and Far East Asia learned from the earlier pandemics and voluntarily wear face masks to protect themselves and those around them even when one has "just a cold or a cough".
People also agreed to socially and physically distance when asked. The messages from scientists and doctors have been enough proof of the dangers that the virus poses.
That is fine, my problem is recently we have just be ignoring the constitution when it is deemed to be a problem
The fact remains the federal government has no constitutional authority nor do most state government.
If we need "pandemic response" authority then we need to amend the constition to add the power to the government not just simply declare it so because "The Experts™" have declared that is what is best for us.
if that is the measure of our rights, we have no rights at all. If rights can be stripped with a simple declaration of emergency, on which there is no power to challenge that declaration then we have no rights at all
To believe the government will not use this unprecedented event for which they have usurped a wide range of never used before power in ever increasing ways is naive and ignores all of human history.
It will not be long before the seasonal flu or cold will be enough to warrant draconian measure and limited on personal freedoms, or be used for privacy invading policies like contact tracing all the time (which will then be used for Law Enforcement like in Singapore)
it amazes me out people can not see what is next, or maybe than can but simply believe the promise (false promise) of safety is more important than liberty
Personal attacks are not cool here, regardless of how wrong someone is or you feel they are. We ban accounts that do that. If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site to heart, we'd be grateful.
Edit: looks like we've had to ask you this more than once before. Please don't do it again!
This was not a personal attack. This was an attack of their position.
A: "We should be doing [stupid thing] X"
B: "Good thing you're not the one deciding."
B is not a personal attack. The entire premise of the point is that it's because of what they said/think, not something personal about that particular individual.
And they do have a cause to detain you -- you might be carrying a deadly virus. Until you can prove otherwise, they can detain you.