Apologies, you are correct that was a snarkish response. I stand by my point though, we don't have any right to see "details" of the accusation. In particular the moderator team seems to resign not because of the particular case but because of structural issues. That is what they pointing towards.

Now regarding the structural issues, I actually could find very scarce information about the governance of Rust. I certainly could not find any information on how the core-team gets selected and what the processes are around being added or removed from the team. I also did not find much about their duties. So in that sense there seems to be verifiable information about lack of transparency (if not accountability).