Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I'm literally taking the narrow conclusion from the second paragraph: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chinese-room/

You should really the entire article, but at least finish the paragraph you're citing: "The broader conclusion of the argument is that the theory that human minds are computer-like computational or information processing systems is refuted."



I have read the whole thing. My point is I’m taking the narrow conclusion and not the broader conclusion, if I have to spell it out to you.

Please continue not responding to the rest of my points.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: