Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I don't really understand how false positives can be eliminated.

They can't, which basically means it's a poor feature and shouldn't have been implemented.



Since a false positive generally causes much less harm than missing a true positive making no false positives a requirement is generally a terrible idea.


As I mentioned in another post, Apple shouldn’t be farming out the determination to emergency services. They can provide an intermediary to determine the severity. The situation is such that a phone or watch does not have enough information to properly evaluate a situation as an emergency or not.


This really depends on how many of false calls happen. There is a point at which these start being detrimental.


Seems like naïveté and myopia are endemic to tech companies, large and small. Smart people who are confident yet clueless.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: