Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No, the counterargument, and why Apple will never do it, is this:

Take an IPA (iOS Packaged Application). Remove the identifying markers, digital signature, change the bundle ID. Lo and behold, it’s indistinguishable compared to an app you developed yourself. Install and pirate away.

On Android, it’s pretty well documented the majority of APK installs are piracy. Possibly over 90%.

Apple will almost certainly, if necessary, allow 3rd party App Stores if the law requires - but direct IPA installation is a pirate’s dream, let alone the actual malware bundled with. Unless the law deliberately and specifically requires it, it’s not happening; and with the strong piracy connections, it’s very unlikely the law will ever specifically require that feature.



That's a great reason why Apple (absent regulation) will never do it, but that's not really the point. I don't particularly care what Apple does or doesn't want.

Software piracy is a fact of life. Attempting to protect against it, and eating whatever (possibly imagined losses) are costs of doing business. That's been that case as long as there have been personal computers.

> On Android, it’s pretty well documented the majority of APK installs are piracy.

How many of those would actually lead to a sale, though? This is the same argument the music and movie studios always trotted out, and it's just as invalid now. Many people just won't pay for things, and will otherwise do without.


There's a certain irony that IP protection would be valued so highly when the entire AI field (which Apple participates in) is built on IP theft.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: