> In 10 to 20 years, it might significantly contribute to environmental solutions, clarifying complex issues or providing effective methods to mitigate climate change.
Most of the issues are known. Paths to solve them have been known for decades if not more.
What's missing is the political and economical will to put them into action ASAP (because it's getting late now).
We're on the fringe of a +1.5°C world already. In less than a century, we will be most likely at +4°C, where most transport/living infrastructure and agriculture will have failed by then.
Whatever AI helps discover (new materials, new energies, new ways to extract energy or means of survival for, not only the human species, but most of the species still alive)...
How is AI going to put these solutions in motion in ways that we can't today? How is AI's "authority" going to efficiently supersede assemblies or governments?
If Earth's biotope is basically cooked in 75 years (in which, even datacenters in which AIs run won't be functional or safe) , how is AI anything close to a best bet for humanity?
Most of the issues are known. Paths to solve them have been known for decades if not more.
What's missing is the political and economical will to put them into action ASAP (because it's getting late now).
We're on the fringe of a +1.5°C world already. In less than a century, we will be most likely at +4°C, where most transport/living infrastructure and agriculture will have failed by then.
Whatever AI helps discover (new materials, new energies, new ways to extract energy or means of survival for, not only the human species, but most of the species still alive)...
How is AI going to put these solutions in motion in ways that we can't today? How is AI's "authority" going to efficiently supersede assemblies or governments?
If Earth's biotope is basically cooked in 75 years (in which, even datacenters in which AIs run won't be functional or safe) , how is AI anything close to a best bet for humanity?