Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm convinced that having individual cars as default mean of transportation sucks, don't get me wrong.

But it's not because “doing nothing” is bad that any decision is good.

This kind of decisions that reduces the freedom of movement of the majority but spare the rich is exactly how people like Trump reach power.

You want to solve the urban planning problem that is car congestion, then the solution is a urban planning one, not a new tax.

Or at least if you want to leverage economic incentives, you have to give everyone working in Manhattan and not living there $200 a month so that their overall purchasing power isn't impacted (the marginal price of taking the car stays the same, and so does the incentive).



The situation as described on the ground seems to be fewer people driving so it seems like it is already working. It doesn't decrease freedom of movement by making people use public transit.

Trump got power because we are a garbage people with neither merit nor intelligence.


> It doesn't decrease freedom of movement by making people use public transit.

It is making people who weren't willingly using public transit use it, so surely it is affecting their freedom somehow.

> Trump got power because we are a garbage people with neither merit nor intelligence.

I don't think this kind of essentialism helps in any way.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: