> Also, why hedge everything you're about to say with a big disclaimer?:
Because her previous (Telegram-only) post on a similar topic has attracted a lot of unfounded negative comments that were largely vague and toxic, rather than engaging with her specific points directly and rationally.
She even mentions it later in this post (the part about “worse is better”). Have you not read that? Ironically, you're acting exactly like those people who complain without having read the post.
> What does this have to do with AI?
It's literally explained in the same sentence, right after the part that you quote. Why don't you engage more specifically with that explanation? What's unclear about it?
Because her previous (Telegram-only) post on a similar topic has attracted a lot of unfounded negative comments that were largely vague and toxic, rather than engaging with her specific points directly and rationally.
She even mentions it later in this post (the part about “worse is better”). Have you not read that? Ironically, you're acting exactly like those people who complain without having read the post.
> What does this have to do with AI?
It's literally explained in the same sentence, right after the part that you quote. Why don't you engage more specifically with that explanation? What's unclear about it?