I was expecting the article to define "reverse acquihire"
>The "reverse acquihire." This term refers to a strategic move where instead of acquiring a company outright, big tech giants hire most of the startup’s key employees and license their technology. This strategy allows companies to bypass strict antitrust regulations while still gaining access to valuable intellectual property and expertise.
Who came up with this term? There's no reverse in that definition. I'd expect a reverse acquihire to be something like windsurf getting Google people and absorbing google. Maybe something like Boeing and McDonnell Douglas.
It's actually just doing the hire but omitting the acqui. Maybe truncated acquihire if they had to have acquihire in the term.
Not saying AI isn't useful or won't be around in the future. No different than the dot com bubble. Internet and SaaS still here. Just saying these things are red flags.
>The "reverse acquihire." This term refers to a strategic move where instead of acquiring a company outright, big tech giants hire most of the startup’s key employees and license their technology. This strategy allows companies to bypass strict antitrust regulations while still gaining access to valuable intellectual property and expertise.