Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I mean, yeah, but also Simon and Speck aren't as good as the new generation of low-footprint designs like Ascon and Xoodyak. We know more about how to do these things now than we did 15 years ago.


In what ways is it better? Security margin or something? I thought Speck has held up pretty well to cryptanalysis (unlike you I'm not in the security field so maybe I'm wrong).

I quite liked the remarkable simplicity of Speck. Performance was better than Ascon in my limited testing. It seems like it should be smaller on-die or in bytes of code, and with possibly lower power consumption. And round key generation was possible to compute on-the-fly (reusing the round code!) for truly tiny processors.


Makes sense! Also, how does Speck fare in power analysis side channel attacks vs Ascon? My understanding was that was also one of the NIST criteria.


I am way out of my depth both on power consumption and leakage, but presumable Ascon does better on both counts than Chapoly.


Realy ChaCha seems trivially implementable without leaking anything.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: