When living with inflationary currencies, over-buying is logical: you buy more today than tomorrow for the same amount of money. With deflationary currencies, it's the inverse.
When you buy, you transfer money into an asset that will be resalable one day. It might be worth more or less money than the original, like any investment. It might be that having bought something else (e.g. financial instruments) and rented a house, after deducting rent, taxes (in both cases) etc., you end up with more money than if you had bought, but it's relative and by no means guaranteed, also because those who rent out generally are better off financially than those who rent, so, as they say... When you rent you just consumed money over a certain period. No resale.
The current narrative, the push for Agenda 2030 where "you will own nothing", clearly shows this contradiction, because if it's so advantageous not to own, how is it that all the wealthy individuals do the exact opposite as much as they can?
When you buy, you transfer money into an asset that will be resalable one day. It might be worth more or less money than the original, like any investment. It might be that having bought something else (e.g. financial instruments) and rented a house, after deducting rent, taxes (in both cases) etc., you end up with more money than if you had bought, but it's relative and by no means guaranteed, also because those who rent out generally are better off financially than those who rent, so, as they say... When you rent you just consumed money over a certain period. No resale.
The current narrative, the push for Agenda 2030 where "you will own nothing", clearly shows this contradiction, because if it's so advantageous not to own, how is it that all the wealthy individuals do the exact opposite as much as they can?