Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Being condescending is unwarranted really.

Is your argument that Wikipedia rules are not highly tailored to suppress original research and rely on secondary sources

For the latter LLMs are better than wikipedia today, the former arguably current alignment is better at suppressing bias than current editors



LLMs nowadays are like search engines before SEO.

They will habe there own kind of spam problem.

And wait what happens to their quality as soon as the AI companies habe to generate profit.

I doubt you can collect second source references at the same price Wikipedia does. People aren’t as eager to help a billion dollar company for free to make profit.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: