Can someone point to research into Xinjiang that is ultimately not sourced from Adrian Zenz or otherwise US-funded?

Why does Laura Murphy's work at Sheffield Hallam not count? E.g.

https://shura.shu.ac.uk/34920/1/Murphy%20Salcito%20%20Elima%...

I'm not aware of any retractions? And what does the US's activity in the UN have to do with this?

And having China involved in stopping this research was the best outcome?

Wow wow

"biased" -- any evidence of that? And what if that is biased? Ever heard of "academic freedom"?

"genocide" -- how on earth is that relevant to this topic?

Dude, the ambiguity and instant whataboutism makes your account extremely suspicious

> "biased" -- any evidence of that? And what if that is biased? Ever heard of "academic freedom"?

Evidence of bias again China? There are plenty outlets that have bias against China, where every mundane action take by the Chinese party is taken as "debt-trap diplomacy," "neo-colonialism," or "strategic expansion".

> "genocide" -- how on earth is that relevant to this topic?

This is topic about "China intimidated UK university to ditch human rights research" so of couse accusation of genocide occurring in Chine is in the topic since GP arguers that episode might be retaliation against anti-Chinese bias.

> Dude, the ambiguity and instant whataboutism makes your account extremely suspicious

I love that every mildly neutral take on China is answered with these. Tell me about whataboutism.

tell me you're a chinese propaganda account without telling me you're a chinese propaganda account