Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Someone should make a site like archive.is that runs the saved page through an LLM to summarize the main points, and perhaps extract a few critical quotes (unfortunately, at the LLM's discretion, but better than nothing). The law is their greatest enemy.


i understand the initial inclination, but leaving our libraries worth of historical data at the whims of our tech monarchs seems like a bad idea.

we know for absolute fact they’ll remove or alter data to entirely change answers. we _know_ they’ll do this.


The idea is to archive the output of the LLM. How are they going to change that?


No, nobody should. Don't know why any trust the gossip slop bots given the extra work required. Pretty brave to trust another word guessing bot when its unable to stop making stuff up. Might want to ask it about Smith-Mundt 2012. Bill says discern, a lot, for a reason.


...as markdown please.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: