Things can have similarities without being the same. Also not being unique is not a moral failure.
I think I am failing to understand your stance.
Patterns are necessarily reductionist, like any sort of comparison of things that aren't 100% similar.
There is value in recognizing patterns. They're useful for comprehension and memory.
I guess we disagree on the reasonable interpretations of this sentence
Things can have similarities without being the same. Also not being unique is not a moral failure.
I think I am failing to understand your stance.