It's hard to catch-on to a deliberately dishonest pretense. You could clone 10,000 John Carmacks to do the job for you, Nvidia would still be a $5 trillion business next time you wake up.
There is nothing dishonest in what I wrote. If you want to really talk about dishonesty then the people you should be addressing are Sam Altman & Elon Musk.
I recommend you move on & refrain from responding to any of my posts in the future. If you're so concerned about the guidelines then reach out to the moderators & make your case, otherwise, I further recommend you save yourself the keystrokes.
Sure, and thieves probably recommend that the cops move on & refrain from following where they're headed.
Be honest and you won't have to fend-off accusations of bad-faith. I'm inclined to agree with your overall point of AI being overhyped, but you've gutted your own logic so hard in the process that your stance is unrecognizable. You've developed a meaningfully ambiguous stance to an elaborate and deeply incorrect series of arguments.
I'm going to add another point to my profile for cases like this because it doesn't seem like the two already there are sufficient. For future reference, the proper way to counter an argument is to present a convincing counter-argument instead of simply dismissing them as "deeply incorrect".
Doesn't bother me either way but you can keep trying to pathologize instead of actually making substantive points to address anything I have actually clearly laid out.
