Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Does MUST NOT in RFCs mean must not ever? Or in the context of the RFCs?


Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html reply


Cheeky. But not relevant. And not an answer.


Why do you expect engagement when you continually respond with bad faith and personal attacks?


My comments contained no bad faith or personal attacks.

Most people do not reply when reminded of the comment guidelines. And the question was rhetorical. But you will engage as long as I do seemingly.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: