Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I consider the devaluation of the craft to be completely independent from the professional occupation of software.

Programming has been devalued because more people can do it at a basic level with LLM tooling. People that I do not consider smart enough or to have put enough work in to output the things that they have nor do they really understand it themselves.

It is of course the new reality and now we all have to go find new markers/things to judge peoples output by. Thats the devaluation of the craft itself.

For what its worth, this devaluation has happened many times in this field. ASM, Compilers, managed gc languages, the cloud, abstractions have continually opened up the field to people the old timers consider unworthy.

LLMs are a unique twist on that standard pattern.



> Programming has been devalued because more people can do it at a basic level with LLM tooling

But just because more people can do something doesn't mean it's devalued, or am I misunderstanding the word? The value of programs remains the same, regardless of who composes them. The availability of computers, the internet and the web seems to have had the opposite effect so far, making entire industries much more valued than they were in the decades before.

Neither do I see ASM, compilers, and all your other examples of devalualing, it seems like it's "nichifying" the industry if anything, which requires more experts, not fewer. The more abstractions we have in reality, the more experts are needed for being able to handle those things.


Excellent take; this is like saying "being an amazing chef is devalued because McDonalds exists."




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: