> Or hell, why not do it in x86 assembly? Because I want to be able to review it... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		esafak 1 day ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: If you're going to vibe code, why not do it in C? > Or hell, why not do it in x86 assembly? Because I want to be able to review it, and extend it myself. edit: Pure vibe coding is a joke or thought exercise, not a goal to aspire to. Do you want to depend on a product that has not been vetted by any human? And if it is your product, do you want the risk of selling it? I can imagine a future where AI coders and AI QA bots do all the work but we are not there yet. Besides, an expressive language with safety features is good for bots too.

whynotmaybe 1 day ago [–]

We could go to the semantic road and proclaim that if you extend it yourself, it's not "pure" vibe coding.

I'm getting too old for this shit.

Capricorn2481 11 hours ago | [–]

Their point is you're not going to be able to extend it if you didn't understand it in the first place.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact