Now you are under the impression that a computer screen is able to become upset? That's a new one.

Are you claiming to be a computer screen now? Hard to believe, but you're the expert on computer screens I guess.

Perhaps it was wrong to assume. How about you describe what you see and then, from that, we can decide what it is that you are interacting with.

No thank you.

Embarrassed to admit that it does, in fact, look like a computer screen, huh?

> Ackchyually, I am a computer screen. lololol

Okay bud.

As valuable as that diversion no doubt was for you, we still haven't established from your data sources how many people are involved in R&D in a hobby/pleasure/necessity capacity and how that compares to those who have chosen to dedicate their lives towards it.

If it is not in the data, you can say so, but it becomes impossible to know how the average person performs in R&D without it. Which then returns us to the original question: "Based on what?"

You wait right there and I'll go right a paper for you.

Dang, brain fart. I guess you win.