I fully understand that. We're using this, along with parsyncfp2 (which you shou... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		rapier1 3 days ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: High Performance SSH/SCP I fully understand that. We're using this, along with parsyncfp2 (which you should checkout) to move 1.5PB of data a month across a 40Gb link. Not saying that HPN-SSH is only useful in that context but different people certainly do have different needs.

chasil 2 days ago [–]

If encryption was absolutely required, I might try it over s_client/s_server or two stunnels, one in client=yes mode.

I'm assuming that would have different limits than you outlined above, although I don't think they do multi core.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact